public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd regression between g:c2a447d840476dbd (2023-08-03 18:47) and g:73da34a538ddc2ad (2023-08-09 20:17) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:56:15 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110973-4-k3mZZ83WZu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110973 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2023-08-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- For generic the biggest difference is in calc_pair_energy_fullelect: Samples: 1M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 2222678752091 Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol 6.68% 132170 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_fullelect # 6.16% 121796 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_fullelect # 6.16% 121875 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_fullelect # 5.98% 118457 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_fullelect # 5.33% 105302 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair # 5.19% 102880 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy # 5.15% 101892 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_merge_fullelect # 5.15% 102119 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_merge_fullelect # 5.02% 99415 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy # 5.00% 98964 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_merge_fullelect # 4.98% 98257 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair # 4.90% 96943 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_merge_fullelect it's again very difficult to pin-point an offender :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 13:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-08-10 14:47 [Bug middle-end/110973] New: 9% namd " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-11 13:33 ` [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-11 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-08-24 15:41 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-25 11:52 ` fkastl at suse dot cz 2023-08-29 9:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-29 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-29 9:59 ` fkastl at suse dot cz 2023-08-29 14:43 ` fkastl at suse dot cz
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110973-4-k3mZZ83WZu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).