From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 977233857359; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:56:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 977233857359 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1691762176; bh=Wda/QwQ46dP+OzTirzXQOiLgtRmdo9QzwZpxT+ZjATs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ET0q+XqaX8kf2Ul2FDRqeu5YmMDktQq4QkjmHHNV9TDhxi6MWWy+Hughu/yygQzrB DD4q8i7j7UHQzuEzyrV66A3z98nAczw5Ho95MnggSZh57Mo5lsoYstKHRU+fiNHh5i wN5n7cE4lqo4P0knzGMim+iUNaljUiN5Iy6VSQ0Q= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd regression between g:c2a447d840476dbd (2023-08-03 18:47) and g:73da34a538ddc2ad (2023-08-09 20:17) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:56:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110973 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2023-08-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- For generic the biggest difference is in calc_pair_energy_fullelect: Samples: 1M of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 2222678752091=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 6.68% 132170 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_fullelect # 6.16% 121796 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_fullelect # 6.16% 121875 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_fullelect # 5.98% 118457 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_fullelect # 5.33% 105302 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair # 5.19% 102880 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy # 5.15% 101892 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_merge_fullelect # 5.15% 102119 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy_merge_fullelect # 5.02% 99415 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_energy # 5.00% 98964 namd_peak.amd64 namd_peak.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_merge_fullelect # 4.98% 98257 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair # 4.90% 96943 namd_base.amd64 namd_base.amd64-m64-mine [.] ComputeNonbondedUtil::calc_pair_merge_fullelect it's again very difficult to pin-point an offender :/=