[Bug web/110983] New: -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[Bug web/110983] New: -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[sray at live dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

            Bug ID: 110983
           Summary: -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option
                    Summary page
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: web
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sray at live dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

In https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Option-Summary.html, the
"-fpatchable-function-entry" is missing.

I managed to find it from the Option Index page. But I think it should also be
added to the summary page.

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-08-11
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
            Version|unknown                     |14.0

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.

I might take a look soonish on why.

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[sray at live dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

--- Comment #2 from Mao <sray at live dot com> ---
I think the issue is in  /gcc/doc/invoke.texi

This flag is missing under "@item Program Instrumentation Options", around line
650.

I can prepare a patch later this week or next week.

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[sray at live dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

Mao <sray at live dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sray at live dot com

--- Comment #3 from Mao <sray at live dot com> ---
Created attachment 55810
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55810&action=edit
invoke-doc-patch

I think this can help fix the issue.
I am not sure how to build the HTML web pages. But I also checked the man page.
The fpatchable-function-entry is also missing in the manpage in the option
summary section. And my fix can solve this issue.

I still need more time to fight with the git-send-mail and my email provider
before I can send this patch file to the gcc-patches mail list...

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mao from comment #3)
> Created attachment 55810 [details]
> invoke-doc-patch
> 
> I think this can help fix the issue.
> I am not sure how to build the HTML web pages. But I also checked the man
> page. The fpatchable-function-entry is also missing in the manpage in the
> option summary section. And my fix can solve this issue.

`make html` is the way to build the HTML web pages ...

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[sray at live dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

--- Comment #5 from Mao <sray at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> `make html` is the way to build the HTML web pages ...

Thanks for the help. Yes, I have confirmed with the generated HTML as well. My
patch can fix it.

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[sray at live dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

--- Comment #6 from Mao <sray at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mao from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 55810 [details]
> > invoke-doc-patch
> > 
> > I think this can help fix the issue.
> > I am not sure how to build the HTML web pages. But I also checked the man
> > page. The fpatchable-function-entry is also missing in the manpage in the
> > option summary section. And my fix can solve this issue.
> 
> `make html` is the way to build the HTML web pages ...

Hi Andrew, 

I have sent a patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628656.html

But I have not got any response. Can you help take it a look, or do you have
any suggestion what should I do now?

[Bug middle-end/110983] -fpatchable-function-entry is missing in Option Summary page

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983

--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law <law@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b42dd1379048fd9cc7eb7039b9dfee02d6884df7

commit r14-5338-gb42dd1379048fd9cc7eb7039b9dfee02d6884df7
Author: Mao <sray@live.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 10 16:22:51 2023 -0700

    [PATCH] doc: Add fpatchable-function-entry to Option-Summary page[PR110983]

    gcc/
            PR middle-end/110983
            * doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Add -fpatchable-function-entry.