From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1E17B3858C66; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:21:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E17B3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698070865;
	bh=YxNTyPzPeCZtT1LKJjz1mg/OwkF5lj3wROrRTvFQQjc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eCKHTQUsEjtkyFF015tnpi4nGPUY5PKPd0AcHSTdecCpzBgYrGksodpp+x5yf2jpK
	 P75ZKhQBwYUqOYY+/FMDqVbnwZpGVusdbjO8st4ndBugH8IXF0x1sU2nnYmiZYVWYS
	 saIQ407YyHvtTolFnPBggWZBXzrxAbq4/R3N0+QI=
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111001] SH: ICE during RTL pass: sh_treg_combine2
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:21:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111001-4-4seaVETSu8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111001-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111001

--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-b=
erlin.de> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #15)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10)
> >=20
> > Do we need anything else before the fix can be merged?
>=20
> No, should be fine.  I'll leave this PR open for a while in case anything
> else related pops up.  Thanks for testing.

Just saw the branch updates, thanks! FWIW, I did observe this issue in gcc-=
13
only but not gcc-11 or gcc-12. But that might be owed to the fact that Debi=
an's
gcc-11 and gcc-12 packages had not received the latest branch updates yet.=