From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D0C193858CDA; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 22:12:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0C193858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691964772;
	bh=zhN9XBiHksjY9aU3uBgPBWWz7CvKWBEt9jP4W4WVfcQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Cy5yrNgKLqmcklhmLLUWA+hCuW8wNFVneyc2tnkGFTDAISyE2fz/XDoMzBdFTCsJx
	 QfONlza2ZUHzRJPYnJP9KUndkWxihckrMQPMHkvuVwJab7bb8knZwOWcFnkHzNZJ1d
	 iNDaEHCMhLqbQ16SraEGBLiz+M9/UMdAqQ/kw+2c=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111008] '>' in a lambda as a template argument causes a
 syntax error
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 22:12:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-111008-4-pmIVU7wqVz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111008-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111008

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The most obvious workaround is to add parentheses around `x > 0`.=