From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BDCAD3854826; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:21:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BDCAD3854826
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692321687;
	bh=QZIHxuNI+95I9h/JoidtFHGZadvwXN3TIKwaiafVR5g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wCBcv2WubySLZOEDcHuRc+77QtTHqYuypIx16wKzA4lbSkg9XWSbxzh7TB2LM2OzY
	 1wnF+fPllLkM0s47TLb2KbGAj1IOE4xVszqtVtMVyUYeRuta0oLiEvXgiAFPFGP1h9
	 rjCSUH+0G5ZzGW+YLk6AhRfK6CbNWX9BnebKC7Kw=
From: "judge.packham at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBzYW5pdGl6ZXIvMTExMDU3XSBbMTEvMTIvMTMgb25seV0g?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YnVpbGQgZXJyb3I6IGxpYnNhbml0aXplci9zYW5pdGl6ZXJfY29tbW9uL3Nh?=
 =?UTF-8?B?bml0aXplcl9wbGF0Zm9ybV9saW1pdHNfcG9zaXguY3BwOjE4MDoxMDogZmF0?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YWwgZXJyb3I6IGNyeXB0Lmg6IE5vIHN1Y2ggZmlsZSBvciBkaXJlY3Rvcnk=?=
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:21:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: judge.packham at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111057-4-x4yFh168TC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111057

--- Comment #4 from Chris Packham <judge.packham at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What version of glibc is being built with here?

glibc-2.38


> Most likely could backport:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d7bead833631486e337e541e692d9=
b4a1ca14edd

Yes looks as though that'd do it. I'll try and whip that up for ct-ng to ca=
rry.
Do you want me to try for a proper GCC patch as well?=