From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B11AB385800A; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 17:43:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B11AB385800A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704044628;
	bh=9PqlOEYPqPMlCxa5ho1DIBOZsaLFdVHftkJjcw3Po+M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VwXFWMVdYx5MRv5TnW9FIHSITNgQWLyhK93AujUkqQISXByqaNac5Y9CXpHl3kDlQ
	 6vB9KrnaTyVV3Qo/dJ22FDMqCloikwJ2uPmYjwL0oIZFz49hugUzuDjEOL/svRnFcG
	 49dsM3XYwthCN0vtJLJIQS8PkBh747twSGwUGl48=
From: "tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect
 multilib reuse patterns
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 17:43:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111065-4-GisdBhw25o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111065

--- Comment #7 from Tommy Murphy <tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to palmer from comment #3)
> The Linux and ELF multilibs are different: for Linux we assumed ISA
> compatibility was up to the distro, so multilib just handles the ABI side=
 of
> things.  That said, C does bleed into the ABI so we should really fix that
> -- presumably we'd need some psABI work there, compatibility is going to =
be
> a bit clunky so it's probably best to just add two explicit ABI variants.

FYI this issue has cropped up again here:

* https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain/issues/1393=