From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 888AC386480A; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 21:09:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 888AC386480A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1692392969; bh=RgAB79edMsjhIPrAu7FQeXw59B7lQ4iTVcG48/pTW8M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xRtUEXLX03HpNzO6xsZ3BfuPQZNgXEYD2XkvYuxHuOuFXLCXquFK0EXIidKy7/LJD WFXiaOQkU4wYjIhBWEI5yd0CDzy29dkFd1z0Eu2AEeCzw9877vOqHEyK7YCKm1+rD4 ztkHOB5vS9hHCSkr0UJkbYUaq7K+ZfJD+CFz3KJE= From: "tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 21:09:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111065 --- Comment #5 from Tommy Murphy --- Thanks for the comments Palmer and Kito. However I'm still a bit confused. Is it the case that the multilib patterns (for the "base" lib and reuse patterns) are interpreted/used differently in= the context of t-linux-multilib versus t-elf-multilib? And my interpretation was incorrect for the former even if it is correct for the latter? If any of this renders this bug report moot then just let me know or close = it off if necessary.=