From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 546F7386480A; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:02:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 546F7386480A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692385342;
	bh=4v7v79RVvVkfyATDe0ciTLF2Qxxs9zYjSaFWMiHmrKw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qivwDW3WCI5Qy2Wq0ThczZJ6XCpHw7+5B8+qnS+mW80dMHfjYvJC430MnhSWvpgOv
	 PodosZkWaWNGEl+g1CWQOf9O9ViJYuI9yu8vVXGTinJictXkC5DjScElAK3vv62EGM
	 nQxhDlF/icFgk+o4wpCwdPxF9Yg9fsBZWgpoXRZA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111069] Mangling of static structured bindings
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:02:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111069-4-iXLNTlIks3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111069-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111069-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111069

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, though this PR has more info.

grep 1[ik]1[jl] pr111069-2.s | grep :
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_0:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_0:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1i1jE_1:
_ZZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1:
_ZGVZ6freddyvEDC1k1lE_1:
shows that for inline functions I think clang++ mangling is right.=