From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1181D385771C; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:05:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1181D385771C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1692608752; bh=S6/LsM99nGwFslWxi+8e8DDHLNTryrf3AQBDpfwA+VI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bo2YWRyKPaNRL+fl62f2dgdXGKFiW+0lvAqp1PXUxmm1l9WWsrKwwPOB1zqRjS8+O 56wnrgb5YdKvEFZrx1k/ev8/7K1mhf5ej78XYkcB37M5M4JhAZA3toPa5VZhbh8UY+ HN7Mf6xD2MVik8vUmh1mNu8Z/GmO4SvNUqUGKKe8= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111082] [14 Regression] ICE in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:214 (AVX512 related) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:05:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111082 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Interestingly we have CODE_FOR_reduc_smin_scal_v2di at vectorizable_bb_reduc_epilogue time where we check && (!reduction_fn_for_scalar_code (reduc_code, &reduc_fn) || reduc_fn =3D=3D IFN_LAST || !direct_internal_fn_supported_p (reduc_fn, vectype, OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOT= H))) which passes. But at that point we have a signed MIN. I have a patch.=