From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 046FE385840C; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:43:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 046FE385840C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711467794;
	bh=i0L9s7KxsQhbQy5T3sXH6tDC9+6hXlLgoRPoQfu9z2Y=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HhuJkI9OhSFpo09pit483o3JuOonTVdkvp8LppTc17aP3jBjYzEBstAqsS0N0ONi9
	 BYaTJod3wjJKXNq6wQP7EVlZ6dnwLkbBRNGrNXKzlY4pssJnGKAYff1NZVqxKHlit+
	 Ky4/MK3bW/63isMf7J6CY8xIfMJUgmHKum28oqs4=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111151] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -O0 on
 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:43:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111151-4-493oTRrNgz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111151

--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e

commit r14-9676-gf536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 26 16:40:53 2024 +0100

    testsuite: Fix up pr111151.c testcase [PR114486]

    Apparently I've somehow screwed up the adjustments of the originally te=
sted
    testcase, tweaked it so that in the second/third cases it actually see
    a MAX_EXPR rather than COND_EXPR the MAX_EXPR has been optimized into,
    and didn't update the expected value.

    2024-03-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR middle-end/111151
            PR testsuite/114486
            * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c (main): Fix up expected value
for
            f.=