From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 052993858C2C; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:51:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 052993858C2C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692964304;
	bh=WQb3MHjuD4G8P5fqoTTknRWkfeW5Aq32TksgNJOZSeQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jzKA8p/NtiNY7Txq359p/cocgOy/lMY0qjhvobI2qElyHW2K6lNaW78hL1waqcJOA
	 ZOND/wPsrddJtUEjVkUdmzP52qiYQxrfBOg6U9MANdKYXTD6l261DQVTPoE5vjeJ86
	 WtMGf7TicT8tr+r8a5VcT4B0VFIbfdX0m7PjSnT0=
From: "mikpelinux at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111151] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O0 on
 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:51:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpelinux at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111151-4-8miz4ztc7G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111151

Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mikpelinux at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> ---
On x86_64-linux-gnu I can reproduce this all the way back to gcc-3.2.3 with
both -m64 and -m32. gcc-2.95.3 compiling for i686-linux-gnu gets it right.=