From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BA0293858426; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:15:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA0293858426 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706782535; bh=SIknjOZiMRWcabrgBpfJa+FupA5dfsp9zGl5s9SkNEE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JUVqfuerS/FPJz2bJe0YyRFfVP2KcQA9W9xQw9ioFcqyenNl6H0+xbe2VYZSBIN/b mRWeNzwN4vF/nGfL6CDAGOAnKmW6XIUqCuStgWCiRUl+x391UienlC+Bl08OIWhX7d EhlAs8G3WrOhcFXlOESXy4BLgTQXxhdic23Sc5nA= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:15:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111156 Tamar Christina changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina --- Yeah, I know it started between g:4e27ba6e2dd85a5ad4751c35270dbd8f277302dd = and g:721f7e2c4e5eed645593258624dd91e6c39f3bd2 but the bisect is hard because s= ome of the commits produce an ICE instead. The bisects lands at commit a739bac402ea5a583e43dbd01c14ebaff317c885 (refs/bisect/bad) Author: Richard Biener Date: Fri Aug 25 09:42:16 2023 +0200 tree-optimization/111136 - STMT_VINFO_SLP_VECT_ONLY and stores vect_dissolve_slp_only_groups currently only expects loads, for stores we have to make sure to mark the dissolved "groups" strided. PR tree-optimization/111136 * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_dissolve_slp_only_groups): For stores force STMT_VINFO_STRIDED_P and also duplicate that to all elements. but the previous commit seems to be an ICE? so I guess this one will have t= o be done the hard way.=