From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E4A7B385022E; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:41:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E4A7B385022E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708000864; bh=K26uupZxxpmWVj4qj4TcjvCdiSbxMpM+QQcj8foUutg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z9oIJV5Xphx8n4ZLskn3SxVXRxCAjVAjqK6R4Llju4joW/C+Tw7OR6btBUJRLnrXT 8HWZhdpQmBa/VpKC6DjXn71+00tURChvoZI5mpQKjO5gxcvbZHsFkJ7Iwgu7j/XI02 0apKMPnnX3++BjMcozxVnW3M0fe1kORFL0T83LjM= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:41:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111156 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- I think the following fixes it, can you verify the runtime (IL looks sane, = but it uses masked scatter stores). diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc index 9e26b09504d..5a5865c42fc 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc @@ -2551,7 +2551,8 @@ vect_dissolve_slp_only_groups (loop_vec_info loop_vin= fo) FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (datarefs, i, dr) { gcc_assert (DR_REF (dr)); - stmt_vec_info stmt_info =3D loop_vinfo->lookup_stmt (DR_STMT (dr)); + stmt_vec_info stmt_info + =3D vect_stmt_to_vectorize (loop_vinfo->lookup_stmt (DR_STMT (dr))); /* Check if the load is a part of an interleaving chain. */ if (STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info))=