From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 78E0F38582A0; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 20:26:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 78E0F38582A0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706905591; bh=91VqiG8cypSddolIivCDu6dDqQOUx+DHQE+OAu3sYnY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UqIElTxw+gKaQYIYWFYvqphWuFqok72Q/XvQjlo5/v5wJ5Rp9t8kyMLAdPEDZhwz4 SlQ61ecarDPwjCiD1GP0GoL4MAzBtPnxAI1QvHPeTxkKKMk3jGh8CqBc5te1NuEFey +D6gRta/mw3tQ+m6SSOnMy9rJcKAciGm3jG8Gw/8= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 20:26:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111156 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > Note I think gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c is the runti= me > failure I mentioned. And gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-in-order-2-signed-zero.c (when tested with -march=3Darmv9-a which I added to my testing recently).=