From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6DE1A3858D38; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:13:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DE1A3858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700529232; bh=COcyDlA6GIBN9DAyGD++1ClVvaVKQptNBTTIJLamlXA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J54zOSyN0YPHuMx/ZK0ZybQzZsuMCTOsdT8wg56s8upsqmbSJZcxAJ9orhXcjY4lq y9RtV7T7khYyJTm6Kw3Ld8Mw8yBoFLTiLNkTFxeRfjov/GmurueFsXV4WhjjEFxqjw 9RC1lXmsOFCm2cQ7yK3jBgjjY5yNYdHXV99W1oPM= From: "lh_mouse at 126 dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111170] [13/14 regression] Malformed manifest does not allow to run gcc on Windows XP (Accessing a corrupted shared library) since r13-6552-gd11e088210a551 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:13:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lh_mouse at 126 dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111170 --- Comment #9 from LIU Hao --- (In reply to Costas Argyris from comment #8) > (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #3) > > Costas, would you like to provide a configure option to exclude that > > manifest? >=20 > I created a patch for that and attached it here: >=20 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108865#c45 >=20 > I have built it natively on x86_64-w64-mingw32 but without bootstrap yet > (not sure if that would add anything in this particular case) and no > i[34567]86 yet. >=20 > It would be nice if you could also give it a go in your builds. I suspect there should be an `AC_ARG_ENABLE` in configure.ac?=