From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CABC83858C30; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 15:39:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CABC83858C30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696261180;
	bh=4ztegTVzR/aTe7vFvrkNKukE7FjoCe53v1Xyay/r8xQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ltWkmnhM+kGNEsgqIT06ACdofUq3QwVJclalHRdwF9OfvBX7n43oYuFNN3TQGdf3l
	 HTuB/M+IyEGQdUhcKPDBtEkgmji2cY2vBebY4fCRqtMk9lmKmze5eMgcyHlmShj4p7
	 phG3jWh9//L3qJ7nnL1z6eRbyo3Mp0UnHToi8jOk=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111235] [Armv7-a]: Control-dependency between atomic
 accesses removed by -O1.
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 15:39:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111235-4-PmROcfhL5v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111235

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Luke Geeson from comment #1)
> Correction=20
> We will follow up by reporting the bug for GCC.
> ->
> We have reported this in LLVM as well

Could you include the link? Thanks.=