From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E09B63858D37; Fri,  1 Sep 2023 08:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E09B63858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1693555797;
	bh=ULi2hyp56+9tmqJss4iwCDh3eePemDd1U0tzft32xME=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tEPAej0TuFBHkEADXicQBODM3QfAsQQEgz456PTdglXNLhuUvHJUKJqotiQg2HzKw
	 2c17iEcoeWbQty0At+CF3yJGzdqI3vZREiFuzW2OM7Nm85EkiOigS4netX9hjLEUG4
	 1ovOFV71Art+jjx8XSEWVtbu2iWAq9G7rmaW3G2E=
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111260] arm: ice in maybe_legitimize_operand, at
 optabs.cc:8054
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 08:09:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-111260-4-4gopKgKLzS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111260-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111260-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111260

David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection

--- Comment #1 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
Reduced C code seems to be:

long long g_263;
func_16_l_1358;
func_1() {
  int p_18 =3D 357942, __trans_tmp_5 =3D p_18 - (p_18 !=3D g_263);
  if (__trans_tmp_5 <=3D func_16_l_1358)
    func_16_l_1358 =3D 0;
}=