From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE38C3858437; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:12:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE38C3858437
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708074771;
	bh=BmDf2cPTR9xMBtLyBmqNhKI6SkTAuGeWN3qTpVUaWZM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ewx/MIXMp9lBh4009/HlIRcfHUVp0V/FZpWS+7uE6v4QxXx5xNvNnemaw0kSWJ2dl
	 U1H/CJTz4tRMO79T5Op8ZcWWM1CQlVIzwbxu48pxLDI9ZHkhO7kj88vBDJP75WVkmM
	 lUnm9Lipaje6AGtwGG8ZfaPrxT+1rNfeR5KUaz8Q=
From: "roger at nextmovesoftware dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/111267] [14 Regression] Codegen regression
 from i386 argument passing changes
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:12:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-111267-4-SuAklyFv4Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111267-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111267-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111267

Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #16 from Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> ---
This should now be fixed on mainline.  The testsuite regressions (on non-x86
targets) are cosmetic, i.e. neither wrong code nor worse performance/size, =
just
differences in expected code generation.=