From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EE6123858D3C; Sun,  3 Sep 2023 19:59:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EE6123858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1693771194;
	bh=TCoh4tnyD7GdHVGG8ZrG+UbtcvwGt9uO14miFzlvIyc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DzIvVFYN6GB7DLVansfzaOo4/btUNKbY7PfXXt0Ho6BbEfYAhqobMS4cmxizqBXLP
	 LxvJYrHhyS5tYxbzP2rULHbKhdVIomCQ+VsaxqGHy3geW8NZA89mwg5K+w2XS4zK72
	 w8ofpYT2G9XMx9DCxG/P0uTAY0Vb/RJLT6lxNME8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBtaWRkbGUtZW5kLzExMTI3OF0gZXJyb3I6IGNhbGwgdG8g?=
 =?UTF-8?B?4oCYLi4u4oCZIGRlY2xhcmVkIHdpdGggYXR0cmlidXRlIGVycm9yOiBjb2Rl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IHBhdGggaXMgcmVhY2hhYmxlIHdpdGggLU9nLCBidXQgbm90IC1PMg==?=
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 19:59:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked
Message-ID: <bug-111278-4-k7BTjJwOUD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111278

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |82738

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh -O0 will also fail.

I suspect this case will just be declared as not to be fixed.
the type for the switch is still int but the range is [0,7] and we don't do=
 as
much optimizations for -Og.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82738
[Bug 82738] [meta-bug] issues with the -Og optimization level=