From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2C36D3858C52; Mon,  4 Sep 2023 01:11:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2C36D3858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1693789867;
	bh=eeklbj4z1KJchSBwg9aeBvQDXWP8kT8LXI2uUP5Jp/E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=St1WbI50RuqrWzUDUz8LtBwb+nfyM0nqXsdZ23Olj3uud6hkpj+xWC+rkb5Juv+ad
	 lAfYAEVUglOyA+zOi4FN9CNKibZs/u9GgTWjTdpayyBzHzQaswQ+msZdryTJutqQMg
	 +f6kYRIqUUq7GhovJxo5PagHchbUS9px34XcVINQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111280] CLZ(0) generated when
 CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is false
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 01:11:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: internal-improvement, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111280-4-dyotvm5LWC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111280

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe during final_value_replacement_loop we should create a new BB for the
COND_EXPR instead of creating GIMPLE_COND ...=