From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 864913858D35; Tue,  5 Sep 2023 19:27:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 864913858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1693942043;
	bh=fwiMoZIM3GGEkGdvOHtWYZXz3gDW8sl82a1vreCRNg4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KTPXOf5T99Mp2o0pkMZhmSjTqEX4aUlsz+0l/cOtksHl/9TtoGFKQoVHsPkOdvWXJ
	 jDpVQrrSuUlVtj01frzBb8DqF6Ul6O2gK8Aq8FgjBKhNY3W/FXmkIuqniUk5V+lf9Z
	 GxJ7mD39kZC02cfTuY+4NWiHoRLFU/UERhYuR2mI=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111284] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Some passing-by-value
 parameters are mishandled since GCC 9
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 19:27:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111284-4-UWGu1wWzyh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111284-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111284-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111284

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, /* Associate the bindings with the remapped parms.  */ in constexpr.cc
remaps those then.  So, that loop should take into account also the invisir=
ef
parms disagreements.=