From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E9C423858C35; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:55:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9C423858C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699995326;
	bh=g+gt2Nd3kHEfHCIY8ALztZMWCbFEjP4vamnfr5RxHEI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ss1XV4gDAZCC4y9U/eWvAXYLIIb3YnXjusqRPsKVCUMHBnyZH8WPmUkkB8maKIHEH
	 smCK+gZtUzciZedNMFKU0IGYDvJ7FgocNPbRt97LODUOGHgj77b7b5SdAiLZ9sbP80
	 zdnH52TdLZ+eicYF3sZ4cMjCjSV80MEmtJGx4qZs=
From: "ewlu at rivosinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111311] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
 --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:55:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ewlu at rivosinc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111311-4-01W3XdjHvL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111311

Edwin Lu <ewlu at rivosinc dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ewlu at rivosinc dot com

--- Comment #17 from Edwin Lu <ewlu at rivosinc dot com> ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #8)

>         =3D=3D=3D gcc: Unexpected fails for rv64gcv lp64d medlow =3D=3D=3D
> FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-8.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "Not unrolling loop,
> doesn't roll"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-8.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "likely upper bound: 6"
> FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-8.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "realistic bound: -1"

tracked in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112531=