From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 227283858CDB; Thu,  2 Nov 2023 21:23:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 227283858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698960201;
	bh=+7bdplKBFe+i50sKqa55IXrto47gcuPQYYKwqQHlPZA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eaQjIfX1F+gYD6C14ZPmpvIr3LEV0aLuYx6p76C7nY5Mw/9/l4aBfjI7V3wnKSpEa
	 Fl2V8SBbigfvaLE9N5uKylMxauDg6LxfHBZbtKtuayU0JSn/Prv/03nuJ7df9zHMoR
	 eHIgEy2OebyohaEmTRIUcbRL/tlvemXm2Y/x7Ti4=
From: "vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111311] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with
 --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 21:23:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111311-4-EVPox4MvTM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111311

--- Comment #11 from Vineet Gupta <vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #10)
> As a general remark:  Some of those are present on other backends as well,
> some have been introduced by recent common-code changes and some are bogus
> test prerequisites or checks.

Is is possible to this identification (so we can at least mark them xfail or
some such). A lot of folks working on middle-end know this for certain, but=
 for
the mere mortals every test failure seems just the same and equally importa=
nt
:-)=