From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5D5AA3858CDB; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 02:56:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5D5AA3858CDB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1698980181; bh=usvNLW73uj2+7blWS4QzyrIxsUYoIWmSdgJd0xWSd1Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YLW0WE1m91zUjpQZvfXGHFaAeWo4B1Lf7pBxbJcv88yX+PlVS0A1cQJbOIjS7iFt/ 6tgLqeD9BoH13cUfRE3QB5IWhE9OhPPQiS/bkip8n9W2D1GKXiZnWBPyGCH0CY38B6 2NioLUg2T0rCsqo+OZwpnFKT7N88ldyraj0P+9As= From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111311] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 02:56:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111311 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- As Andrew said, if there's a test that depends on behavior of -INT_MIN, then the test needs to be fixed. That's undefined behavior.=