From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8561A3858C98; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:15:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8561A3858C98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1700097337; bh=+XoVf8J94jxukpwHFPH4rA6NOW8gHWr3MrOm+7GS4Rg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=D9P97h22A5+F0PNUglkm9lKxoSkWFoLtVkCzEJldvKJidoF+UuMW4PNYYClscocDR syXZiHsTkhkZ0DDUf14fk71w+ao45DoGMceOyn1bL56r5dGD3zN38BIBuv75sdPn5T TKiGDnEoRGG0GhsCvCQeWWYvDQU7t6g4w5Odump0= From: "patrick at rivosinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111311] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with --param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:15:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick at rivosinc dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111311 --- Comment #20 from Patrick O'Neill --- (In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #19) > Dump FAILs should be ignored as I said before since they are also failed = on > other > targets. I have analyzed all dump FAILs. Got it - I posted all the failures for completeness. Edwin is going to send an RFC soon to XFAIL those dump FAILs.=