From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9F191385771B; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 02:16:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9F191385771B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694139375; bh=kWmwxAFCUcuxns1tlpV2Dptc4k835bkTyzxG2ya5t1E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NxsCYEaQj3zjtE25AEA3rfNIyTuIZBZH5FYQ1rUfGN+o2A6TUHgoAFAvvbLZ7/lT+ Hx4L2449tDFlE9L7q5tfeRgJkaIxuegTSS+xiA9IfBKfYEE1FJBz+fm/J0uqaP5A8l DR1ddByFOKEQrhw9x/McDTN2yQf72Z2PmPjQqaio= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111332] Using GCC7.3.0 and GCC10.3.0 to compile the same test case, assembler file instructions are different and performance fallback is obvious. Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 02:16:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111332 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Anyways the tuning was fixed for GCC 11. GCC 10 is no longer supported so closing as fixed for GCC 11.=