From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 83E5C3858C2D; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:45:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 83E5C3858C2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694522741; bh=VOAFoiaoMDwmnWYTwwJmgriHJZyIWZYVHzk3AroRr8o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bp1tktwobMWf2xrr+wEWfgRRCRfM6/3zyQvGQnVA9stiDbQNIajNqb355Z9QeODHG zwh/uVVhxY4gGSrUVWfx7mH1Jb5NuSLc+kpXK0u4EJ7Wv9bYAzoLcVC/dMzAFMH/M6 aJjxZZ3K2lvmqffwtOpIbrcjZLwcRklpoBYp9Msk= From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111337] ICE in gimple-isel.cc for RISC-V port Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:45:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111337 --- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp --- Yes, I doubt we would get much below 4 instructions with riscv specifics. A quick grep yesterday didn't reveal any aarch64 or gcn patterns for those = (as long as they are not hidden behind some pattern replacement). But aarch64 doesn't encounter this situation anyway as we fold differently before.=