public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111337] ICE in gimple-isel.cc for RISC-V port Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:49:50 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-111337-4-LaWIV37cH3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-111337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111337 --- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > vect_patt_67.34_168 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... > }>; > vect_patt_68.35_169 = (vector([4,4]) int) vect_patt_67.34_168; > > -> > > vect_patt_68.35_169 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... > }>; > > this one looks odd - it's probably > > /* Sink unary conversions to branches, but only if we do fold both > and the target's truth type is the same as we already have. */ > (simplify > (convert (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2)) > (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type) > && types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), truth_type_for (type))) > (vec_cond @0 (convert! @1) (convert! @2)))) > > the problem is that this happily produces a vec_cond we might not be able > to expand - having the same truth type for the data type isn't enough > if there's no optab with a matching data mode. Same for the view_convert > case. > > It's a bit convoluted to ask for target support here, can you double-check > it isn't possible to add native riscv expanders for the missing case? You mean support(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > vect_patt_67.34_168 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... > }>; > vect_patt_68.35_169 = (vector([4,4]) int) vect_patt_67.34_168; > > -> > > vect_patt_68.35_169 = VEC_COND_EXPR <mask__5.33_165, { 1, ... }, { 0, ... > }>; > > this one looks odd - it's probably > > /* Sink unary conversions to branches, but only if we do fold both > and the target's truth type is the same as we already have. */ > (simplify > (convert (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2)) > (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type) > && types_match (TREE_TYPE (@0), truth_type_for (type))) > (vec_cond @0 (convert! @1) (convert! @2)))) > > the problem is that this happily produces a vec_cond we might not be able > to expand - having the same truth type for the data type isn't enough > if there's no optab with a matching data mode. Same for the view_convert > case. > > It's a bit convoluted to ask for target support here, can you double-check > it isn't possible to add native riscv expanders for the missing case? You mean we should add "vcond" patterns back ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-12 11:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-09-08 8:39 [Bug c/111337] New: " juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-09-08 14:55 ` [Bug c/111337] " rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 11:37 ` [Bug middle-end/111337] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 11:49 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai [this message] 2023-09-12 11:58 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-09-12 12:17 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-09-12 12:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-09-12 12:41 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-09-12 12:45 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 12:50 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-09-12 12:53 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 12:55 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2023-09-12 13:03 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 14:16 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 20:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-12 22:15 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-111337-4-LaWIV37cH3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).