From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2F9D93858D38; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 16:02:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F9D93858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1694188945;
	bh=vXi9G0G73plNVXuHqTOCvCyhU6ioz7waTticwtOTkRY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ymV/BL83BvlErT6lNECFfXkdGJ5/ajXxz9YpbFt56E8SVXbvhNRB+hWHeBvirl49u
	 vD+qH3OB+jRO1JSl6u1PgNutS9a1E1mHk+SN7FW5pHE9fJI3GHUgPmyxL2wyVr6+A9
	 KqYh3FedqgV3zFFeRCggVl0pGPoZnYRXnK4W5Kt0=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111340] gcc.dg/bitint-12.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin
 or fails on x86_64-linux-gnu with -fPIE
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:02:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111340-4-gDPXMJa71P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111340-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111340-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111340

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |uros at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Of course, what exactly falls under the "g" constraint is target specific.
Though, because that constraint also allows the constant to be reload into a
register,
if such constant isn't valid, then RA should have reloaded it into register=
 or
memory.

Seems the failure is that i386.cc (output_pic_addr_const) doesn't have the
CONST_WIDE_INT case unlike output_addr_const.=