From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DCE423858428; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:09:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCE423858428 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694502598; bh=b9EO5hpMujiOR9/Sk+cCNCzIsBGUOCkv5ZtQPU1gUpU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NAKJEjH/eqoNpqf+G4knbqFN+GJEpBbezuyAfgED0hnnlccHWhPIcEYwe9lLNMJF0 ui22APUwV39T/o4ejom5dowLwuU/JmIafd4zu0ZnbEpV6noD/PO4mx3BKrtN0vr3Dx G/pE6ZYWXlurJzaowOK8DuWI9f37YkW/cTaBlxHQ= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111366] error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'hwy::PreventElision(int&)void': target specific option mismatch Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 07:09:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111366 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Comment #13 from Kewen Lin --- I'd assume that most of applications don't adopt HTM features from Power8 a= nd Power9 at all, adding an extra option -mno-htm can be considered for them f= or this special case of HTM removal in a later CPU (Power10).=