From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 290663858C35; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:38:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 290663858C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698039513;
	bh=QA5ZQAlc5lfumqHAaFwUAQBPLhC6rl0gS8SbrpNSAck=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MPBGBRqHLFGWWFLrS0klIaRnxCI5jLr870k9mbI/NnIsdXrAAmjAzsoZwi2Vmqtl7
	 TUQJWnM8OXFcAvIJE73GEhqwIVlEJNc7xAoRNE6TsHI8ZOtMcC2zMI2NSVBJYFme2a
	 qjVfjxmN7A7yNgLbHf5Rkkd3dQWsT3q7qXZpq7Zw=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not
 between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:38:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111367-4-3qV3dBSOYs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111367

--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin <linkw@gcc.gnu.org=
>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ae7f45ea0d9caa54ebd5dc19caf94fa002e7ee2

commit r13-7975-g3ae7f45ea0d9caa54ebd5dc19caf94fa002e7ee2
Author: Kewen Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 12 00:05:03 2023 -0500

    rs6000: Make 32 bit stack_protect support prefixed insn [PR111367]

    As PR111367 shows, with prefixed insn supported, some of
    checkings consider it's able to leverage prefixed insn
    for stack protect related load/store, but since we don't
    actually change the emitted assembly for 32 bit, it can
    cause the assembler error as exposed.

    Mike's commit r10-4547-gce6a6c007e5a98 has already handled
    the 64 bit case (DImode), this patch is to treat the 32
    bit case (SImode) by making use of mode iterator P and
    ptrload attribute iterator, also fixes the constraints
    to match the emitted operand formats.

            PR target/111367

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (stack_protect_setsi): Support prefix=
ed
            instruction emission and incorporate to stack_protect_set<mode>.
            (stack_protect_setdi): Rename to ...
            (stack_protect_set<mode>): ... this, adjust constraint.
            (stack_protect_testsi): Support prefixed instruction emission a=
nd
            incorporate to stack_protect_test<mode>.
            (stack_protect_testdi): Rename to ...
            (stack_protect_test<mode>): ... this, adjust constraint.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.target/powerpc/pr111367.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 530babc2058be5f2b06b1541384e7b730c368b93)=