From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C330A3858D32; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 02:15:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C330A3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695089745;
	bh=pGeRJ/zG9rkLe2x7npIcCkJfSZCudLcvGQk7l/TfYzo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gL7/CzZrP8xep4PgJOVYTxfLiTltllsnr6TH2+9Wya0At8639l6ggrb7fzCjtLuEh
	 lYu207PDRL7qH0eXyplDCWyCUdIBOpYJov3Y/UrVPfKE0/bs1Dj8nCyUU++Xb0XvlJ
	 mIotSa+oSyIuWvHC0b2ayV3jTZVD6ORWZMW1bVxc=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not
 between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 02:15:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111367-4-4K02bWwerp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111367

--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for both of your comments!

(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8)
> Mike will know better than I, but I like the idea of the patch!

Looking forward to Mike's reply. :)

(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9)
> I don't like that "wzd" attribute at all.  Please just put an "if" for the
> mode
> around this -- everywhere else (including in a large part of this patch!)=
 we
> deal with SImode and DImode separately already.  Or perhaps you can use t=
he
> "ptrload" attribute,
> which includes the "l"?

Ok, nice tips!  I will use "ptrload" instead.

>=20
> There really should be a comment why one alternative needs the %U{n} and =
the
> other can
> ignore it, btw.  Nothing new there, but a head-scratcher :-)

OK, something like: "prefixed load/store insns only have D-form but no upda=
te
and X-form"?=