From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7B1433858C50; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7B1433858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695056627;
	bh=bOdBdWv8zacQvd3c9yU+8P9NJY42JQ7huQ2xM+bvTkQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mmQaZSLJaN1b8kdkxQ3t0zYNv+tOjDRP5Ria+65/TbeDSaazSN4o+HZeFXG6K5kb8
	 Q3A70nELpYcpsAqwl8OVrzQuJw40TLWnL+zDdF9sn1HMOZCpFBXj8LD8dgUN13zWpm
	 BiDVJVM2bi1a0aLTPkAcA4GhcaPoJC8nCNkiX53A=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not
 between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:03:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111367-4-BdYyWg9X88@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111367

Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|gnu@the-meissners.org       |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> #c6 is the tested patch.
>=20
> Hi Mike, I noticed that you committed r10-4547-gce6a6c007e5a98 for DImode=
, I
> wonder if not updating SImode (32bit) is intentional at that time?

Mike will know better than I, but I like the idea of the patch!=