From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BFDD23858417; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:56:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BFDD23858417 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695059805; bh=6wQtFn08ZR9++bpnDJ7hCWdYNZLprGAFwqkL1CIAKrI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PBtMFhLtaziaWBkNIg/TFSOXeOSqLM+4RzEpi+21mxiheomSlzBszvm9sDOqafa1t GYPPtK7UUyKV0iHqUyS/F+QxPXXTd+0EVh/9aS6xW13OOgJKWp0/J7HmRdm0IutsQm UWcvXGbZL9ZJ5xv95FAoVmWs/POphAbP2VbCkFXk= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:56:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111367 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- I don't like that "wzd" attribute at all. Please just put an "if" for the = mode around this -- everywhere else (including in a large part of this patch!) we deal with SImode and DImode separately already. Or perhaps you can use the "ptrload" attribute, which includes the "l"? There really should be a comment why one alternative needs the %U{n} and the other can ignore it, btw. Nothing new there, but a head-scratcher :-)=