From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 916183857342; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:31:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 916183857342
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695141065;
	bh=aAD3jiaTdCSwvAWi1hoLCTOn1VUOUZZXnSEdei8GIfU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xU9Srefxce6k6Cshmmbzqjbt1JUowGmR6q+17lR3RgbZDAw/lculV1t6c2GU80tff
	 bGiWkhpg6rK2GoEvuouT1YmX83dkIP3K527LSCxsblpnfwZwGVttpe27/ZE0G+jo+K
	 IulAd6YrnRtOenV6xuQ5AVqk7PlhaZmcOUWouaK4=
From: "gnu@the-meissners.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not
 between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:31:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gnu@the-meissners.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111367-4-e9ETZH5tro@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111367-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111367

Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gnu@the-meissners.org

--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org> ---
Basically I did not consider the case.  IIRC, you only need the stack prote=
ct
DI mode case if the stack is large enough (more than 32K).  I don't think
32-bit programs could have a large enough stack that would force them to use
prefixed instructions.

But it should be simple enough to use the :P iterator to catch both SI and =
DI
cases.=