From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 680753858C50; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:29:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 680753858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694564991; bh=o7NFOBEqtgg3HibG498vUIYwREbMqS4rjDY5cbsadxg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RbJZmVPrXFKCb15j1e+uQI8aYHwZcJ2x5KYlsS5zP7cM6h7ORf7uBOyu3RHOObXJk l0frAljeRkLqsYL2vixK0QjuovOc8VePTTfTa1qUs7Q+jpcFjIwrt0IsNiZ562QQRw op3fPJITO7uFUYlWuWbp0W08ycmbUlQIr/ijPdcY= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/111390] 'make check-compile' target is not useful Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:29:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111390 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think what you're describing or looking for is something completely different, which might be useful but is not what is present today. The libstdc++-v3/scripts/check_compile script cannot be turned into what yo= u're describing. There's simply no way to get to what you want from a naive shell script that isn't parallelized, and doesn't understand the dg-* directives = in the tests, and only supports a single -std option for all tests. What we have today is not useful. A replacement would have to be written fr= om scratch anyway, so ripping it out entirely has no downside as far as I can = see.=