From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 92CC3385840C; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:47:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 92CC3385840C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694598441; bh=FTKQi6AcXBWi7b6GfWGpUiPLQY1prRi3MjdWOQ8y9XI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=icIrP9/EA02a1evaBNtYh7ZzHdVgf0tluXNg+zZ7XTuaQVXdYtEimwA0szKG1NhpF YhBzvQAiKbbyVs+aJpsed783axFvdwj0P/wMEY/7+CEdPAgWWfp6xlCH0Re3HUCz1N /Vd3bJEJ/yD/cefLXyCPnim75cGrG5CSuw1Rh2qQ= From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111402] New: Loop distribution fail to optimize memmove for multiple consecutive moves within a loop Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:47:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111402 Bug ID: 111402 Summary: Loop distribution fail to optimize memmove for multiple consecutive moves within a loop Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: crazylht at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- cat test.c typedef long long v4di __attribute__((vector_size(32))); void foo (v4di* __restrict a, v4di *b, int n) { for (int i =3D 0; i !=3D n; i++) a[i] =3D b[i]; } void foo1 (v4di* __restrict a, v4di *b, int n) { for (int i =3D 0; i !=3D n; i+=3D2) { a[i] =3D b[i]; a[i+1] =3D b[i+1];=20=20=20 } } gcc -O2 -S test.c GCC can optimize loop in foo to memmove, but not for loop in foo1. This is from PR111354=