From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 711C33858C98; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:43:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 711C33858C98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709217810; bh=9RCHmmkDaB1el4Qukt6cfCcRkjtmyx0flZno696M7pA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jr1jJOGl+1CvAYq5FlDQ08PeDZvxaYa4oHiZ3+ainZ+Ca2YDkBUuvT+4XblToqam2 fgUlA5Up7Rk9BLkFTRo+pYJ5ifp97jusPuu1byjVqyhRevmhTOb9Wfo8SMWn/oKyVr YvNeWHpdvIqq3ud0gpW109UfcnFgn/KRRfy0i3+0= From: "qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111407] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption due to widening_mul opt on conflict across an abnormal edge Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:43:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111407 --- Comment #13 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > (In reply to qinzhao from comment #10) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > the fix has been in GCC14, shall we backport the patch to previous rele= ases? >=20 > Since it is a regression, yes please. So, How far back should I add the fix? gcc13, gcc12, till ?=