From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D15583858D35; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:20:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D15583858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1694780428;
	bh=mokibRqyzKsNBIdyOQafkJToARlLM8dP+KLNAGFMcYs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=on2Hsgqbahwm/6z49GoDXsgk6XqM/wbpBUz8GsRUFP5d1bWVMWZ6p9AeD1N8zoXDX
	 1Yorj3G/Z3ba32caaDbhrAw1ZAF3Ger/I1St83Yqlt2dSZNGG6Yn/NKl5qCEsMbT8B
	 HBpoUdgk4PIOST0hpci+ZCyR05geq9zdMlfSzhRI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111422] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:20:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cc bug_status keywords
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-111422-4-SnUcH7SVIr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111422

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection, wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-09-15

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  We segfault at *n[0], also happens with -O2 -funswitch-loops,
still happens with -O3 -fno-unswitch-loops.=