From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D0944385DC06; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:47:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0944385DC06 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711554471; bh=mFGMvFP6uDUcsCYZrrnVe9aUYskOZgUm0WejhYRod1s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FqrEC65y+e+EiPUgwIt1A1TznMfMHAFwcPDYO9eJWhHemA+74fYjJYJj9WZo1w/hN /WaihLr7DMyHwWxey084pPNptHx87xDVeVGZsmWGm0PAmq+KkJkmav0UqJ0SZAKaeL 2pZ/Ay3A1E8qReciA+82RTk76+5nZdVI2XclF1Oc= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/111426] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:47:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111426 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I meant that g++5 emitted 111426.C:7:3: error: use of deleted function =E2=80=98D::D()=E2=80=99 D d; ^ 111426.C:6:7: note: =E2=80=98D::D()=E2=80=99 is implicitly deleted because = the default definition would be ill-formed: class D : public X { }; ^ 111426.C:6:7: error: use of deleted function =E2=80=98X::~X()=E2=80=99 111426.C:3:3: note: declared here ~X() =3D delete; ^ which seems more user-friendly than 4 errors, and saying that X::~X() is deleted twice. clang++ emits only one error. But, maybe it's not that bad after all. Feel free to close this.=