From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E2AA0385843B; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:05:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E2AA0385843B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711551933; bh=poghSEhOBYZ8vR2NqzO08JE9Ee3EvYZbwmsHHxB7V/A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K14Sv3t8lj+m4ZbqKzXJNQ/tgF0lnYJmpFibRyAXzPCSysTpe12eq87i/P5LjtOjC yU9cVK5qVw7usDCIZevzhMWZlLZKWXJZ06iANseUrSA+bZmYMyLjvaEW2sIbNxnNvn VqachZ1SXa08cA/m6RmMknIHV2GuA9+W//R7ExMs= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/111426] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:05:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111426 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- These are two different diagnostics. One error is about using deleted D::D() and explains why it is deleted, the other is about using deleted D::~D() and explains why it is deleted. Do you mean we shouldn't diagnose using deleted D::~D() when we already diagnosed some other special member (D::D() in that case)?=