From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BE34F3858C00; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:19:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE34F3858C00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694967553; bh=tdqkzCB84MjQTZa6GJoPowi0MGIKbtUZ7mP7iKbun+Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DaeJcTouFZhlSGik6QCQdSXyNTJWcTsKTNVx1uhIh9SH+EyRXO9Y48V6/uMm9MRVs N8+O/Tu11pi0FvTY5etAym7ZId/zbNyVlTa4Nv/bm1DQmftm45jrHhoqLUwedvGfsV 89L4uyJnd2J5MgziJUYYsElGiwOdw6QL4f3Gfebo= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111444] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-gnu since r14-3226-gd073e2d75d9 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:19:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords short_desc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111444 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |alias, wrong-code Summary|Wrong code at -O2/3/s on |[14 Regression] Wrong code |x86_64-gnu since |at -O2/3/s on x86_64-gnu |r14-3226-gd073e2d75d9 |since r14-3226-gd073e2d75d9 Last reconfirmed| |2023-09-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. The code must not take into account that *i and *j could alias ???????=