From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 252823858C50; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:58:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 252823858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695059932; bh=0B9zeVwqncA+pYUfpvG2WUGPHTNlm5jNr0JpqOjILZk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aapiEdbZPnE57dWPJHDyVp7CbISz28e4QqL1zQu6xbIRiZbDWBBJAgGmTTb52BqM2 Y6KHejqAKym3hS1XDANCcuSJuTvmuflyDpzdhCY7m92bShIN1AYlTCEDM27p+LY9PP +gc/5ujhDeLeHq2/o5wu/WK8+po1GIlTDsglfvtM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:58:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111462 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|tree-optimization |testsuite Keywords| |testsuite-fail --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if the rule for the xfail/target should change here due to the IV-= OPTS difference like the riscv64-*-* case (note that should really be riscv*-*-*= ).=