From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 193C73858D39; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:19:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 193C73858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695118760; bh=NtZNT/yPCeN+HMFYFX7K+ts98OdWvc9i/EGG/OiUNk8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rXQrBrb+YDlvsK8YiFn2X9YO6jb/qA3Lr3MqTICyJrtwwyOsH8zHCU44qRA6eJYWe G+c5+5+xT9hc/4Oek8ef8IGqeU9snrDQ+wUC0GyMvAqxDfv2gyalE0LMyCETxeM9tL BLqCu8rM+xzSZNryRSsKW3Kw2gaILrC8kQXAym8w= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111465] [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap from r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471d0dcee01 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:19:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111465 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102844 CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So we simplify if (iftmp.2_137 <=3D location_138) .. else { _16 =3D (signed) prephitmp_15; if (_16 < 0) ... to _192 =3D (signed) location_138; if (0) .. else { _16 =3D (signed) prephitmp_15; if (_16 < 0) ... and then thread - actually we have registered the forward thread already and registered the block with the def of _192 as EDGE_NO_COPY_SRC_BLOCK (because it was empty before). This is essentially a duplicate of PR102844 which has gone latent.=