From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 319BA3858D3C; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:47:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 319BA3858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695109623; bh=ymB/8h0FyRro5jUITP6lx1tiMCX5XywD9gCTnyXvh68=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=igX8gCoIqUEmrPXXD9wEEmnhFA3zFzhtASF5VylPPldqalu32MQbvPQM3F4/Si0dQ EHwWPXJBNIitvfYfNMmnHRjUIbL1JfnBGcsvpfo8uMOSTKdZ9pH65K5FwxlIQaRy/2 xkC/3v2rnvpt4Z4PeFouT/M8T6U/9FDgJIgGe17s= From: "shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111472] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-4563-gd0d8b5d836 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:47:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111472 --- Comment #2 from Shaohua Li --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) > Another ivopts issue. >=20 > Note that if something is different with different -O levels it's almost > never a "c" bug. The "c" in component only covers C frontend which only > contains very straightforward optimizations. Thanks for the explanation!=