From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B73883858401; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:06:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B73883858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714136761;
	bh=7SbPIcoHYmeOSkdfihdfBeUn+XjlES6siGlMbySBIEk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ct6+v150cSbCJCrGTPyoY0lPNUaMy9JmfPN52pzbBKiPGMyNRWzeX5lU7pWMgtp9V
	 llbOL9MY13p03JGcbZJ8QSOpbIAeGJ8fmVntTbTuTdzOiLgYqP/fkkUPNwy5o2aVCK
	 cBfNzO4I/3qxQk7tamOLTgU5S574S2c4y6BOl7ks=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/111475] [14/15 regression] Many C++ analyzer tests
 FAIL
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:06:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111475-4-9HiubaMNoB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111475

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder what to do about this PR for GCC 14:

* It increased analyzer failures from 92 on the gcc-13 branch to 1482 on tr=
unk.

* This is a massive regression for sparc-sun-solaris2.11, a primary target.

* I never got any response from either the patch author or David as analyzer
  maintainer.

In the worst case, I guess it's better to disable the analyzer testsuite on
Solaris rather than having this insane amount of noise.

Thoughts?=