From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3D9A33858C1F; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:30:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3D9A33858C1F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695133805;
	bh=fksIfc8+33jcjLtq0ctWKj7zUi9l/goC6Hy5T703C+g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PP+xhd081Y6oAuDmmjGtu4kMc9i7jxDi+A1iN04gGYJiZpnyJ0GH8MzvCrwef7GRO
	 2D8jybgSOWjhbrqTknuGF9k7UnotuTtgEpWx3jIE6ZWZA4qjKCiLJereT6nMUbnodU
	 fFSRHklVkiAgHI34FE28BltS3LqzE2R34jdsvcZg=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111478] [12/13/14 regression] aarch64 SVE
 ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:30:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
 target_milestone bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-111478-4-cnldVwaSzb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111478-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111478-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111478

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |aarch64
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-09-19
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  We have a two-operator operation in the preheader instead of in=
 the
loop body.  IIRC we have a duplicate for this, this is all invariant operat=
ions
and we get confused applying loop masking to it somehow.=