From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 295583858D39; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 21:01:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 295583858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695243687; bh=QFuMmBwLdZiqf7HNiWo58JgGHJsUmqSYMtNQSCehKBg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bImHpuN+lqHsU5MD/LozpcsEZNM3fS9pXmKcsc2NearvhlRzbcmuzW3SzdHykR/V2 4ZIzCZonhCDuNmdBsJ0zX0eiZ6x2U3++PRuINk2XO2eOWOfieA625oBB+u7whPAHS3 wn/EONig1poF2j6C/ktIn/mDX3k87xg7Iantpdww= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/111504] compare operator not defined for recursive data types on C++20 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 21:01:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111504 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Fails for the same reason with clang (both with libstdc++ and libc++) .... Are you sure this is valid C++ 20 code?=