From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 955143858D39; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:12:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 955143858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695334345;
	bh=9awQCplFva/rrGu3ZEqbyPS6TrR7e7Q/WMzqgmy0akM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=isBB8c8MmU3o8I3oco+e0LVcyylqJVPJGFsoiILjNclhU1QoRuzySbHS27yOfRIT1
	 XWkDBEsSffc0L4WSIDcs2MVqxCwqDA6M2Jee9XXE2E8ORt4aHDPfBw0KevlHU8DeaY
	 sROxUoyNBU9G5HfFkFKaaO6Z/1hZjlQhQqm7hZrU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111529] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on bool conversion in
 an unrolled loop condition inside template lambda nested in another template
 scope
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:12:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work
Message-ID: <bug-111529-4-h74PQ8J5ew@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111529

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|10.1.0                      |

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Maxim Plyushkin from comment #2)
> It appears that this regression happened between 8.3 and 8.4, not between
> 10.1 and 11.1.

Oh the default C++ version changed between 10 and 11 ...=